The 2024 presidential election between President Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris has stirred strong emotions and intense curiosity among Indiana University students.

With IU located in one of Indiana’s liberal strongholds, many students expressed feelings of disappointment and frustration over the election results.

“I woke up, checked my phone, and cried,” said Tatum Stalter, an IU junior. “I feel like it’s really disappointing that so many people voted, in my opinion, against women’s rights, minorities’ rights, anyone in the LGBTQ+ community, and for the future of our democracy and our nation.”

For some students, the results felt like a step backward, particularly on issues such as abortion rights and equality. These emotions have fueled discussions across campus, both in classrooms and student organizations.

However, not all students shared this perspective.

“I cast my vote for Trump, and that’s because I agree with much of what he says, especially on economic policies—despite my personal vendetta against him,” explained Dylan Wallace, also an IU junior.

Wallace acknowledged the polarizing nature of this election but emphasized the importance of making choices based on personal values. “At the end of the day, I had to decide what I think is best for the country, even if it’s not a perfect choice,” he added.

IU created opportunities for students to discuss their thoughts. One such event was the “After the Vote” panel, held the day after the election.

The panel featured former O’Neill Dean John Graham, Political Science Professor Steven Webster, and Cathy Fuentes-Rohwer, a member of the Monroe County School Board.

The event was so popular that the room was packed, with people standing in the back.

Panelists discussed their personal reactions to the election results, President Trump’s previous term, and the future under his leadership, as well as Kamala Harris’s role as vice president.

Students voiced strong concerns during the discussion. One asked, “What can we do when the different levels of government seem to be working against us?”

School choice policy was a major topic, with students worried about its impact on education.

The panel allowed students to express frustrations, seek clarity, and gain insight from those with different perspectives. It provided an open space to discuss the election’s aftermath and the way forward.