Tag Archives: Featured

NIL Ruling Brings Contrasting Effects on College Athletes


Warning: file_get_contents(https://data.mediaschool.indiana.edu/transcripts/wp-json/wp/v2/lookup/1751071?iframeembed=true&playerId=kaltura_player&entry_id=1_vq924ncu&flashvars[streamerType]=auto&flashvars[localizationCode]=en&flashvars[sideBarContainer.plugin]=true&flashvars[sideBarContainer.position]=left&flashvars[sideBarContainer.clickToClose]=true&flashvars[chapters.plugin]=true&flashvars[chapters.layout]=vertical&flashvars[chapters.thumbnailRotator]=false&flashvars[streamSelector.plugin]=true&flashvars[EmbedPlayer.SpinnerTarget]=videoHolder&flashvars[dualScreen.plugin]=true&flashvars[Kaltura.addCrossoriginToIframe]=true&&wid=1_ji98mb9y" width="400" height="285" allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozAllowFullScreen allow="autoplay *; fullscreen *; encrypted-media *" sandbox="allow-downloads allow-forms allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-top-navigation allow-pointer-lock allow-popups allow-modals allow-orientation-lock allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox allow-presentation allow-top-navigation-by-user-activation): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request in /bitnami/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-wcms-msch-shortcodes/msch-shortcodes.php on line 132

By: Annabelle Purkey, Grace Hunteman, Aaris Moore, and Macy Bair

BLOOMINGTON, Ind. (Nov 5, 2024)

A few months ago, Purdue University swimmers Brody Friend and Sam White were finishing up practice when their coach called the team to the side. Their eyes panned back and forth around the room, looks of confusion on everyone’s faces. Although they were unsure of what would be said, they didn’t have any reason to be alarmed. This soon changed. The swimmers were told that because of newly instated laws regarding NIL, the team could only suffice for a roster of thirty next season. Friend and White knew their college athletic career was on the line. 

Indiana University Red Steppers performing at football game.
Indiana University Red Steppers performing on the field at a football game. They are a crucial part of the IU Football experience. (Photo courtesy of @iuredsteppers on X).

On the contrary, Indiana University Red Stepper Jaylyn Hogan has seen many positives of the NIL ruling. Although she herself cannot acquire NIL deals because of university rules, many of her peers have done so and found it to be valuable to their athletic career. 

College athletes across the nation are experiencing the game-changing impacts of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals in starkly different ways. While some star players rake in lucrative endorsements and expand their personal brands, others struggle to find similar opportunities, widening the financial gap and creating new pressures. This shift is transforming college sports, raising questions about fairness, financial management, and the potential for NIL to either empower athletes or deepen divides among teammates and programs.

NIL stands for Name, Image, and Likeness and refers to the rights college athletes now have to profit from their personal brand. In a landmark 2021 decision, the NCAA suspended previous restrictions on athletes earning money from their NIL. This ruling allowed college athletes to accept endorsement deals, sponsorships, and other revenue opportunities, such as social media partnerships, merchandise sales, and personal appearances. The decision marked a major shift in college athletics, granting athletes like Friend and White new financial freedoms while also introducing new complexities within the teams. 

For college athletes like friends of Red Stepper Jaylyn Hogan, NIL has been transformative, opening doors to revenue and opportunities that wouldn’t have been possible before. When interviewed about her opinions on NIL and its effect on college athletics, Hogan replied with nothing but positivity. NIL has created a sort of pressure around sports, but nonetheless it is a way for student athletes to gain recognition and compensation for their hard work. 

“I don’t believe there are any negatives to this ruling,” said Hogan. “It highlights their efforts and how much work they put in, in and out of the sport.”

Interviews on the street, asking strangers and students their opinion on the Name Image and Likeness ruling.

 

###

 

 

 

Name, Image, Likeness:The Free Agency Effect on College Athletics

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE.

MEDIA CONTACTS
Daniel Stewart
Alexa Plon

The arrival of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) agreements has ushered in a transformative era in college athletics as its created an environment reminiscent of professional sports free agency. Since the NCAA allowed student-athletes to monetize their personal brands in July 2021, the landscape of collegiate sports has shifted dramatically, impacting recruitment, athlete management, and financial opportunities.

NIL has opened numerous doors for student-athletes, enabling them to secure lucrative sponsorship deals, partner with brands, and capitalize on their social media influence. This newfound financial freedom has allowed athletes to earn significant income, sometimes reaching six figures annually. A recent survey highlighted that approximately 70% of Division I athletes are engaging in NIL activities, illustrating its widespread growing acceptance.

However, the emergence of NIL has also intensified competition among collegiate programs, turning recruitment into a high-stakes game. Schools are not only competing for the best talent based on athletic performance but also on their ability to offer enticing NIL packages. This shift has prompted athletic directors and coaches to rethink their recruitment strategies, focusing not just on the development of players but also on their earning potential through NIL.

Photo of Dr.Clavio
Dr. Calvio, an expert on NIL, speaks at Indiana University Bloomington to a captivated audience. He discusses the complexities of Name, Image, and Likeness rights as well as offers his own valuable insights.

Indiana University of Bloomington’s Professor Dr. Clavio emphasizes the importance of understanding the evolving market. “Most businesses in the NIL world are trying to reach an elusive generation,” he notes. He argues that education is key to maximizing these opportunities: “We should begin teaching students how to effectively use and maximize the potential of social media at the high school level.” By teaching young athletes the skills to navigate NIL, universities can prepare them for its many complexities.

The transfer portal has further complicated this dynamic. With the ability to switch schools more easily than ever, athletes can seek out programs that not only fit their athletic goals but also offer better NIL opportunities. The portal has effectively created a space where top talent can shop for the best deals, making it crucial for schools to present competitive NIL offers to attract or retain athletes. This competition for talent mirrors the dynamics of professional sports, where teams leverage financial resources to secure top players.

Photo of James Goodis
Prior to the season, Indiana basketball player James Goodis, 21, proudly flexes his jersey, showing off his team spirit with a smile. A strong advocate for NIL, James passionately supports opportunities for college athletes to benefit from endorsements
Photo of Jordan Rayford
At 20 years old, Indiana basketball player Jordan Rayford strikes a pose, dribbling the ball through his legs during a photoshoot. He carries a realistic perspective on NIL and advocates for a balanced approach to athlete compensation

Indiana University, basketball players James Goodis and Jordan Rayford are directly experiencing the effects of NIL on their careers. Goodis firmly believes that “money is the biggest factor right now in college athletics,” emphasizing that athletes should be paid in line with their brand value to reflect their worth. On the other hand, Rayford, a transfer from the Air Force Academy, takes a more cautious stance, stating, “you can’t pay players outrageous amounts of money for doing something basic, so the collectives will be more controlled.” This debate highlights the excitement and challenges among athletes as they navigate the balance between sports and entrepreneurship.

The possibility of establishing imbalances among programs is a serious concern as schools adjust to this new reality. Institutions with greater financial resources may have a distinct advantage in attracting top talent, potentially increasing the distance between smaller programs and larger schools with more resources. The challenge lies in ensuring a level playing field, where all athletes have the opportunity to benefit from NIL.

Photo of Nick Saban
Former Alabama football coach Nick Saban, along with Alabama athletic director Greg Byrne, met with various senators in Washington on Tuesday, March 12. They discussed the key issues that NIL brings and its impact on college athletics.

Prominent coaches are weighing in on the effects of NIL on college sports, and few have been vocal such as former Alabama head coach Nick Saban. He has expressed deep concern about the changing dynamics of college athletics, stating, “All the things that I believed in, for all these years, 50 years of coaching, no longer exist in college athletics.” Saban reflects on the core values that once defined the college experience: “It was always about developing players, it was always about helping people be more successful in life.” His comments highlight the increasing challenges athletes face in their decision-making processes, as financial incentives now overshadow traditional priorities in recruitment and player development. This evolution complicates the fundamental mission of college sports, shifting the focus from personal growth to money-making NIL deals.

Furthermore, NIL’s regulatory environment is still changing. As Congress debates potential legislation to standardize NIL rules, the future remains uncertain. Coaches and administrators are aware that the direction of these discussions could significantly impact how colleges navigate this competitive environment. As Saban stated, “We’ve got to figure out how to make this work. It’s important for our players, our programs, and college athletics as a whole.”

As the NIL era unfolds, it is clear that the relationship between college athletics and business is becoming increasingly blurred. The strategies that universities employ today will determine their success in recruiting and retaining top talent in an environment that resembles professional sports more closely than ever before. For student-athletes, navigating NIL will require not only athletic skill but also a strong understanding of business. The connection between NIL and the transfer portal is opening a new chapter in college sports, one that requires everyone involved to be flexible and think ahead.

Interviews were conducted with ordinary people around the college town of Bloomington, Indiana regarding NIL. Community members share their different perspectives on this important issue.

###

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is the NIL fair for all athletes alike?


Warning: file_get_contents(https://data.mediaschool.indiana.edu/transcripts/wp-json/wp/v2/lookup/a>): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found in /bitnami/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-wcms-msch-shortcodes/msch-shortcodes.php on line 132

By Meara Doran and Jane Negus

Bloomington, Indiana (Oct. 7, 2024)

The NIL was introduced with the intent of NCAA student-athletes earning deals from their name, image, and likeness. The initial purpose of the NIL was for all athletes to benefit from endorsement opportunities, yet these seem unfair. Many high-profile players in sports such as football and basketball are securing lucrative deals unreachable to those not well known. Athletes in sports that don’t attract as much publicity often struggle to inherit the same type of support and endorsements. This disparity has sparked questions about whether the NIL is a fair system. The goal of the NIL is for college athletes to profit, but many people question whether this is a fair market for all college sports. Are smaller sports being overshadowed by large-market athletes and sports?

Dr. Eric Smedley and Dr. Tiffany Galus, Co-directors of the Marching Hundred
Photo taken by Malik Davis

There are varying opinions about NIL in the college space, and many people have differing thoughts and opinions about NIL collectives. As the NIL is newly established, there is still a lot of unknown. From recruitment dynamics to the financial benefits for athletes, the effects of NIL policies are becoming increasingly evident. Dr. Eric M Smedley, Co-Director of the IU Marching Hundred and Athletic Bands, had some insight into this issue. The introduction of NIL rights has brought new challenges to maintaining fairness in college sports, particularly in recruiting. Dr. Smedley explained, “Schools that had successful “brands” had a leg up right away. Schools in larger cities, where more businesses are to offer NIL deals to help sell their products, automatically have an advantage. Schools in smaller markets are disadvantaged. West Coast schools are at a disadvantage because their teams play late games on Saturday to stand out – but a lot of this happens after East Coast people are in bed.” This inconsistency has resulted in notable differences in the opportunities accessible to athletes based on their school’s geographic location and market position. Dr. Smedley also talked about the differences in NIL deals between those in popular sports and sports that don’t get much publicity. He explained that “The NIL collectives that have risen, parallel to large universities, help athletes secure NIL deals; however, the focus is on the big profile sports. These collectives work closely with athletic departments, who want more revenue. The more popular sports will win out in that equation.” For athletes not in the limelight, creating a personal brand robust enough to secure NIL deals can be a challenging endeavor, especially without backing from institutions.

There is also a conversation that suggests college athletes should be receiving compensation beyond NIL deals. Many questions come up surrounding this issue, including: How should that compensation be structured to ensure fairness across both high-revenue sports like football and basketball and lower-profile sports? Dr. Smedley answered this question with confidence, stating. “This is coming. The NCAA lawsuit settlement from over the summer dictates that universities can pay up to 20 million a year – but there is language in there that specifies that the money has to be shared equitably with the other non-revenue sports.” As college athletics evolves, the balance of fairness, opportunity, and financial equity will stay vital to conversations.

Dr. Tiffany Galus, Co-director of the Marching Hundred
Photo by Malik Davis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The topic of NIL has certainly changed the way college athletics and athletes are viewed. Dr. Tiffany Galus, Co-Director of the IU Marching Hundred and colleague of Dr. Eric Smedley, explains that “NIL has created a new, unique environment for college athletes,” adding that the NCAA and other college sports organizations are still “workshopping this new landscape.” The distribution of NIL support remains uneven across programs, with Dr. Galus hoping that “in years and seasons to come, this can be more refined and balanced.”

The disparity is especially evident for athletes in smaller or less popular sports. When asked for her opinion, Dr. Galus said, “It depends from program to program and there are many nuances to how the NIL support is dispersed, as funds are not only provided through the college programs, but through outside organizations as well.” While Dr. Galus supports financial compensation for athletes, stating, “I am in favor of college athletes being supported financially for their efforts,” she emphasizes that any compensation structure should be dependent “on a program-to-program basis, which hasn’t settled yet, in this new NIL landscape.”

Professor Galen Clavio conducts a press conference with C250 students about name, image, and likeness (NIL). Photo courtesy of Kenzie Vitale.
Professor Galen Clavio conducts a press conference with C250 students about name, image, and likeness (NIL). Photo courtesy of Kenzie Vitale.
 
Even with all of this uncertainty in this realm, Dr. Galen Clavio, head of Sports Media at IU, has a positive outlook. He stated that “[with] a large social media following, you have the ability to capitalize on that yourself. It’s nowhere near the amount of money that men’s revenues sport athletes are getting just for existing in many cases, but it has meant that there are some female athletes who have been able to capitalize at the college level … which might open up additional commercial possibilities that weren’t there before.” His perspective highlights the growing opportunities for certain athletes that may not have always been present prior to NIL deals.
 
While the introduction of NIL has raised significant concerns about fairness and equity across all sports, there are still opportunities to be made. The landscape is still changing, and the distribution of these possibilities remains uneven. As NIL policies continue to evolve, finding a more balanced approach that ensures fair chances for all athletes remains a key challenge for the NCAA and other stakeholders.

 

NIL: The Popularity Contest between Student Athletes

By Charlie Smith, Lucy Little, and Shayna Oppen.

BLOOMINGTON, Ind. (November 5, 2024)- Landon Gilmore was just 6 years old when he was first branded with the nickname “Happy”. The name has since stuck, making his NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) grow exponentially. 

Ever since Gilmore won the long drive competition, In which he was originally called “Happy”, he has been popular in the golf scene not just for his name but for his ability to play. On June 23, 2023 things truly changed, as Gilmore announced his commitment to Ball State University to play Golf In a Twitter post. The Twitter post went viral after Adam Sandler (The actor who created the character of Happy Gilmore for the Film.) commented on the commitment.

“Go get ’em Happy. Pulling for you.” Sandler said in the post. 

After the post went viral Ball State gained a lot more attention. 

“Between him and I, I want to say that we gained 23 million eyes on Ball State that haven’t been there before.” Gilmore said about himself and Sandler.

Happy is crouching down as he is writing something down. Happy remained focused on the task at had while doing so. (Photo provided by Happy Gilmore. Photo taken by Ball State Sports Link Team.)

Since this, it has raised the question of how much do schools benefit from students like Gilmore? Dr. Galen Clavio, Director of the National Sports Journalism Center at IU, addressed students’ questions at a press conference about NIL. One student asked about schools choosing players based on popularity instead of skill.

 “This has been a question since the beginning of this, I’ve yet to see it happen… the coaches that control those teams want to win, and they have a limited amount of resources and whatever small positive effect you might have from a popular high school player  is just a drop in the bucket, compared to the effects of having a winning team.” Clavio said.

Dr. Galen Clavio addresses all C250 students in a Press Conference for NIL and all corresponding aspects of NIL. He addressed why people think that pursing popularity will become an issue for some athletes. (Photo taken by Emma Pearce)

A lot of people have feared the possibility of favoritism when it comes to sports recruiting for college teams, creating some controversy with NIL. With that, people have also questioned whether or not it would start to affect high school students who are trying to get more attention. Some are wondering if it is going to create greater pressures and struggles for these students trying to get recruited. 

Happy Gilmore mid swing in a purple uniform while he plays for his Highschool team. Happy showed focus and integrity as he played. (Photo provided by Happy Gilmore. Photo taken by Paul Baechtold)

“There are two different aspects of NIL that we have to keep in mind. There’s the NIL that just comes from being a good athlete and ultimately the idea that you have intrinsic market value at the college level as an athlete in whatever sport and that value is not equal just because you happen to be an athlete… Now the other part of NIL is the athletes who are really good at media. Who understands how to utilize media, bring in a social media audience, if they are also good at their sport that’s awesome but for a lot of businesses that would like to contract with an athlete from an NIL perspective the question would be: what market do you bring to the table… So yes, if you are a high school athlete who is trying to gain a media presence that will carry over into college, then yes that can be an added pressure.” Clavio said in correspondence to being asked about the added pressure of NIL on high school athletes.

Ball State had already accepted Happy before he went viral, he was recruited for his skill. The Fame he brought to the school was just an added bonus for Ball State. 

With his NIL, Gilmore rarely has to buy his own equipment anymore because of equipment deals he has accepted, but NIL isn’t as simple as a lot of people seem to think. 

“It adds a lot of business into my life. A lot of people think that it’s really simple, but it’s quite complex because there are a lot of laws, and there are a lot of things that you have to do. But as far as it affects me financially, NIL definitely helps. I don’t have to worry about paying for equipment because I am lucky enough to have a few equipment deals.” Gilmore said when questioned about how NIL affects him personally. 

Happy Gilmore watches the ball intently after putting while sporting his Ball State uniform and gear. Gilmore used equipment from deals while doing so. (Photo provided by Happy Gilmore. Photo  taken by Ball State Sports Link Team)

Popularity is a huge factor when it comes to NIL as well, especially if you participate in a sport other than Basketball and Football. This is relevant because the only two sports that generate significant revenue for the NCAA are Men’s Basketball and Football. Which causes a lot of the student athletes to have a hard time getting NIL money unless they are very popular.

 “Obviously in a sense I want it to be fair, But I don’t think that being fair would be fair… At the end of the day it is like a business right, and so if and so I feel like if everyone on the basketball team is getting paid the same amount, it’s not fair for the guy who is doing all the media stuff because he is the most popular. Or the guy who is head and shoulders better than everybody. Obviously those people should get more, and with our golf team, you’re never gonna see a billboard in Muncie of our golf team. It’s gonna be the Basketball team.” Gilmore said when asked if all athletes should be paid the same amount, or based on popularity and skill.

According to Sports Business journal, Social media equates to about 72% of all NIL activities. The three main categories being: Social media Influencers, Personal Brand, and selling content directly to fans. This is because if student athletes didn’t utilize social media platforms to boost their popularity all the money would go straight to the main Money makers: Men’s Basketball and Football. So to be “used” more they must have an outside presence besides just relying on their sport.

“I don’t feel like anyone can complain about making less when at the end of the day we are being used less.” Gilmore said adding on about the NIL pay system in college athletics.

Bloomington residents comment on why the believe college athletes should be paid. They go into detail about all of the pros and cons of how NIL pay currently works.

 Jason Ghandi, Assistant Director of Strategic Initiatives at IU, gives his insight into how NIL can be based on popularity.

“athletes are picked based on social media following for certain deals, unless the company is asking for a specific player.” Gandhi said.

Most of the athletes that are getting the mainstream deals, such as Powerade for example, are getting those deals based on how much reach they have on social media and sometimes that player isn’t always the most skilled on the team. A lot of times a company already has a player in mind. 

“it’s sort of like natural selection on how athletes are picked.” Gandhi said. 

Jason Ghandi, Assistant Director of Strategic Initiatives at IU, Posing for a professional photo. Ghandi talks about NIL with student Lucy Little In a recent interview. (Photo provided by Jason Ghandi)

Players aren’t necessarily competing against one another but they do have to sort of fight to get their name out there more than their teammates. It’s obvious the amount of money athletes get is going to be based on the popularity of their sport and IU for example “men’s and women’s basketball and football will always get the higher dollar value than a smaller sport like golf”, Gandhi said. But that then poses the question of do smaller sports like golf get any money? Gandhi was asked if all sports on campuses are reached by NIL deals. 

 “It’s common for at least one athlete from each sport to have a NIL deal of some form at most schools.” Gandhi said. 

So, although most sports are going to be reached with deals it’s obvious that the more popular sports are going to be getting the most attention from brand deals making it seem like a game of popularity. 

 

How Bad do Athletes Really Want it When it Comes to the NIL?

By Kiera O’Reilly, Isabella Trine and Sophia Sessa.

BLOOMINGTON, Ind. (Oct 31, 2024)—Imagine you are just a junior in high school, sitting down at your kitchen table on the phone with a D1 sports coach officially offering you a spot on their team. Continuing your sport means it will become your whole life, but you don’t get anything in return in terms of financial support from your own performance. Not knowing what your future holds, and worrying about how to make money, however yet you put all your time and effort into that sport. Then, flash forward to the 2021 Supreme Court ruling, you will probably have no hesitation in what your next step will be. 

 

In July of 2021, the Supreme Court ruled that NCAA athletes could capitalize and profit off of their name, image, and likeness- also known as NIL. Prior to that ruling, college athletes were not given the opportunity to receive any financial compensation for their own NIL, as it would go against the NCAA’s “amateurism” condition. Now with this opportunity being open for athletes, it’s up to the high school aged athletes to decide where they will attend, as well as the extent they want to push themselves to build their own NIL.  Opening this up for college athletes, it creates room for brands to become sponsorships and give more attention to the athletes leading the athletes to continue getting compensated. 

 

Dr. Clavio talks to class about NIL
Dr. Galen Clavio, Professor at IU and Director of the National Sports Journalism Center at Indiana University, gives a speech on NIL. (Photo curtesy of Kenzie Vitale)

“Everybody in this room has the rights of publicity, you have the right to profit off your name, what you look like, and how your likeness is utilized within any form of media or advertising or business. This is not a case of new rights being granted to college athletes, it is instead the removal of restrictions that were being imposed by college athletic departments upon college athletes.” says Dr. Galen Clavio, a professor at Indiana University Bloomington and director of the National Sports Journalism Center at IU.  Having this opportunity to open up for these collegiate athletes, it’s a much more of a motivation to continue to work on their own NIL and build what they have, while getting the deals and sponsors they are allowed to officially work with. 

Izaiah Steury, current cross country and track runner at the University of Notre Dame shared his views on NIL. (Photo courtesy of Izaiah Steury.)

“I think the NIL is a great opportunity for collegiate athletes because they earned it but at the same time I hope this opportunity doesn’t ruin the experience of being an athlete.” says Izaiah Steury, cross country and track runner at University of Notre Dame. He suggests how the financial side of athletics shouldn’t be the main reason to work hard, rather than just doing what you’ve always loved. The NIL has had a very positive impact on college athletes, and is benefiting athletes to profit from all the hard work they have put in. Steury continues to go on and say, “I have not received any NIL money due to not putting enough effort into it.” This shows the dedication athletes need to put in from the recruiting process through their college athletic carrier to build their NIL. 

2 players on the womens lacrosse team at Indiana University pose post game.
Olivia Gall, current lacrosse player at Indiana University, shared her opinion on NIL. (Photo by Sophia Sessa)

The sponsorship opportunities are just one of the many factors that play into how athletes are choosing where they will attend college, and how the recruiting process has had to adapt to the new landscape of college athletics. “I think it one hundred percent impacts the transfer portal. When you are at a bigger school, you have more offers from more brands.”, says Olivia Gall, current Indiana University student and lacrosse player for Indiana University. With that being said, due to the NIL, it can be harder for smaller and less known universities in comparison for example a Big 10 school even if they are equal at athletics. Brands want to get their products and names out to the public, collabing with well known athletes benefits both parties which is what they want. 

 

When looking at Indiana University and these other well known, big D1 schools have a much higher chance to recruit these top athletes not because of their athletic departments, but as well as the NIL benefits the athletes will gain. 

 

 

Individuals going throughout their day while walking on Kirkwood were interviewed on their point of view on the NIL.

 

###

How NIL Deals are Shaping the Future of College Athlete Branding

By Sarah O’Brien and Xavier DeVany

BLOOMINGTON, IN (Nov. 7, 2025)

NIL is changing college sports, allowing athletes to be compensated for their name, image and likeness. The 2021 Supreme Court ruling gave college athletes control over their NIL rights while abiding by school rules and state laws. Previously, college athletes were not permitted to profit from their NIL. This change allows athletes to profit from partnerships, endorsements and/or brand collaborations, especially for those with a strong social media presence and marketability. With NIL, brands use athletes as a marketing tactic to reach certain audiences, and athletes use brands to reach other audiences and enhance their success and monetary value in diverse ways. 

High-performing or easily marketable athletes benefit the most from NIL deals. Athletes become marketable in a variety of ways such as creating content, public sightings, social media presence, etc. These athletes also often partner with brands to promote products or services, utilizing their visibility to boost their market value.

Galen Clavio provides a press conference discussion in C250 Storylab 1.
Galen Clavio, associate professor at Indiana University, speaks to a classroom of C250 StoryLab 1 students about using social media to enhance athlete marketability under NIL policies on Oct. 15. Clavio emphasized that strategic social media presence can play a crucial role in leveling the playing field for all student-athletes. Photo taken by Emma Pearce

As Dr. Galen Clavio said, “Social media influencer athletes gain themselves market value,” showcasing how an active social presence is essential in attracting partnerships. Social media sites, including Instagram, TikTok and X, allow college athletes to engage with their audiences as they create content which could consist of showing their sports routine, their life outside of sports or anything public showing their life. Actions like these make them more appealing to a broader range of potential sponsors. 

One way athletes look to enhance their marketability is by posting frequently and creating a relatable persona. Shaan Burke, an IU men’s basketball athlete, said, “Relatability is a big thing. If you are a more relatable person, being active on social media helps a lot.”

Shaan Burke spins a basketball at Assembly Hall.
Shaan Burke, an Indiana University men’s basketball player, spins a basketball at Assembly Hall on Oct. 29th. Although he doesn’t see much playing time, Burke shared that he benefits from the NIL success of his more marketable teammates. Photo taken by Sarah O’Brien

Burke mentioned that one of his teammates, Anthony Leal, connects with his followers by sharing his love for country music on TikTok. Now that Shann’s teammates can partner with notable brands, the merchandise and amenities his teammates receive from their partnerships also get passed around to Shann. With the NIL, normally all the players do not receive the same commission as the rest of their team, as they most likely all have different brands or brand deals. By taking the time to build a personal brand that showcases genuine and relabel interest, athletes can attract targeted partnerships that align with their passions and values. 

For athletes not in the spotlight, NIL still offers opportunities. Burke suggests using university resources, such as networking with assistant coaches and leveraging connections with alumni or team donors.

Jeremy Gray, Director of the Cuban Center, sits at a desk with a mic and rig in preparation for Hoosier Hysteria.
Jeremy Gray, director of the Cuban Center, tests a new mic and rig in preparation for Hoosier Hysteria on Oct. 10th, 2022. Gray emphasizes that frequent posts and active social media engagement are key for helping athletes boost their marketability. Photo courtesy of Jeremy Gray

“You have access to a lot of resources that the school offers, “Burke said. Likewise, Jeremy Gray, Director of the Cuban Center, suggests athletes to “put the social in social media…tag your teammates, respond to fans…all these things help” Gray said. Active engagement on social media platforms helps athletes build a following and increase their visibility, which is crucial for marketability and potential sponsorships. 

While NIL provides new opportunities, it also adds new responsibilities. “Having a financial advisor is a big deal,” Burke acknowledges, as many college athletes, fresh out of high school, lack experience with handling such a large amount of money. Attempting to manage new income streams while balancing academics and training can be overwhelming, which is why he recommends this guidance. With proper assistance college athletes looking to sustain their financial success beyond college can ensure that their NIL earnings become long-term assets. 

NIL affects athletes in many beneficial ways but also in a negative way. Before NIL was in effect, athletes had a constant stressor with their financials, training and academics. Now athletes have taken on a whole new level of responsibilities, public appearances, maintaining their brand image, maintaining relationships with partners and many other constant responsibilities for young adults. While these endorsements do not directly play into how a player performs, they still have an impact on the player’s mental and physical health. NIL has empowered college athletes to profit from their band while adapting to the pressures of self-marketing. To make themselves more marketable athletes must engage on social media, build a relatable brand and utilize available resources. Through these efforts, even athletes with less of a spotlight on themselves can find avenues to benefit from NIL and create partnerships that extend beyond their sports careers. 

Gabe Hissiong, Pete Macarthy, and Marissa Finney, visitors on Kirkwood, share their thoughts on how athletes can boost their marketability for NIL deals. Their responses highlighted the importance of leveraging social media to build a personal brand.

###

 

NIL Impact Has On College Athletes Exceeds Just Athlete.

Photo taken By Lauren Pence

By: Kennedy Leppert, Lauren Pence and Elle Woodward

On a cold Christmas morning, snuggled up in a blanket, Lauren Leal was told she had one last gift to open. Instructed to go outside to the mailbox, Lauren figured her brother had forgotten a gift and ordered it last minute.  When she retrieved the letter addressed to her in the mailbox, she soon came to realize this was more than a Christmas gift, it was life-changing. Her brother, Anthony Leal who is a senior on Indiana University men’s basketball team, had paid off her student-loan debt.

When Anthony was just a sophomore at IU, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of college athletes making money off of their Name, Image and Likeness; often referred to as NIL. NIL provides a way for athletes to make money while attending college, which has become a controversy with recruiting and the transfer portal.  NIL has the ability to provide a generational impact, especially for athletes that are great college players but not good enough for the pros, they can capitalize on their collegiate abilities.

Dr. Galen Clavio explaining to IU C250 students about the ever changing world of NIL. Being an expert in his field, Dr. Clavio was insightful on the benefits NIl has for collegiate athletes. Photo taken by Emma Pearce.

Dr. Glen Clavio, professor at Indiana University, is an expert in how NIL impacts collegiate athletes and the benefits it provides. Talking to a C250 lecture hall, Clavio described what NIL is and all the components it adds to an athletes college experience. “This is not a case of new rights being granted for college athletes, instead a removal of the restrictions that were being imposed by college athletic departments on college athletes .” Clavio said. With the recent ruling on House vs. NCAA stating collegiate athletes from the last 10 years who were unable to receive monetary compensation for their Name, Image and Likeness can now be paid for their monetary impact on the college they attended, there has been some pushback about how much these collegiate athletes are making.

Anthony and Lauren Leal on vacation in Florida. One of many family vacations, the Leal family always makes time for each other. Photo provided by Lauren Leal.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

After a long month of traveling to watch her brother play in Vegas, studying for finals exams with an impending college graduation, Lauren was hoping to push the stress of the upcoming student-debt payments off past the holidays.  Anthony, seeing this stress that Lauren had, knew something had to be done. With brand deals as big as Adidas, or local Bloomington restaurants like Mother Bears,  Anthony has been able to use the Supreme Court ruling in his favor. “I don’t think I’ve ever truly felt shock like that, I had so many emotions.” Lauren said.  Her brother had paid off all of her student debt without her knowledge. Without the implementation of NIL, Anthony never would have been able to help his sister with her student-loan crisis.

Collegiate athletes at all levels, not just Division I, are feeling the ramifications of NIL. Hanover men’s basketball player Rhett Johnson and his family also had a positive impact once the NIL ruling was passed. “It helps with the small things, even just gas for them to come visit me.” Johnson said.  While there are going to be cases of young collegiate athletes spending money on items deemed irrelevant or reckless, the everyday impact that it has on athletes and their families can be easily overlooked. The impact of NIL goes deeper than just the surface level that is often portrayed in the media.

Rhett Johnson posing with family after one of his basketball games. Trips to see their grandson are now easier with NIL money being used to pay for gas. Photo given by Rhett Johnson.

NIL has created an unprecedented time to be a student athlete in college. Often times without guidance from their universities legal teams, young athletes are faced with making tough decisions. While this can be quite overwhelming, NIL has also created a way for athletes to give back to their families after years of them supporting them. With cases like Lauren Leal and Rhett Johnson, the impact NIL has not only on athletes but their families will be talked about for generations to come.

 

The implementation of NIL changed how collegiate athletes can make money. People on the street told us how they feel about the benefits it can provide for the athletes families. 

 

The Impact of NIL: Redefining College Athletes and The Athletic Landscape

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

The Impact of NIL: Redefining College Athletes and The Athletic Landscape

Media Contacts
Ethan Bonheur
Gabe Morrison
Lauren Kuechenberg

  With the NCAA’s 2021 decision allowing college athletes to profit off their name, image, and likeness (NIL), student-athletes nationwide have gained new opportunities and complex choices. No longer bound by NCAA restrictions on athlete compensation, students now weigh financial opportunities alongside traditional factors when choosing colleges. This has made NIL a critical factor in the recruitment process, with schools nationwide—particularly in states like Indiana—without comprehensive NIL laws. For Butler University’s D1 basketball player, Ryder Cate, deciding where to play college ball wasn’t just about finding the right coach or campus culture. The potential for NIL income had become a part of his college equation—a factor unimaginable a few years ago. Emily Bonchik, Chair of the Student Athletic Board at Indiana University, observes this shift firsthand. “High school athletes today are looking for a complete package in their college experience,” she explains. “They’re not only evaluating athletic facilities and academic programs; they’re also considering which schools have robust NIL support systems that can maximize their financial opportunities and brand-building potential.”

Ryder Cate poses for a photo during Butler’s media day. Cate is a freshman at Butler University where he plays basketball at the Division 1 level where he received many NIL opportunities

  NIL rights have transformed the college recruitment landscape, promoting high school athletes to consider not only where they can play well but also where they can earn well. This shift is particularly significant for athletes like Cate, who have the potential to leverage their talents and social media followings for financial gain. Dr. Galen Clavio, director of the National Sports Journalism Center at Indiana University, notes that NIL has fundamentally changed how athletes approach recruitment. “We are seeing athletes become more strategic in their choices.” He states, “For many, especially those from financially constructed backgrounds, NIL income is not just a bonus; it’s a necessity that can significantly impact their futures.

  In Indiana, the absence of specific NIL legislation until recently has presented challenges for the state’s schools in competing for top talent. While other states, like California and Texas, have enacted laws that promote NIL activities for athletes, Indiana has taken a more cautious approach. However, the Indiana University Athletic NIL Policy, updated in September 2023, provides a comprehensive framework for student-athletes to engage in NIL activities while following NCAA regulations. Bonchik describes IU’s proactive stance in addressing these challenges. “We’ve started initiatives to educate athletes about NIL and help them navigate the process,” she states. ”Understanding contracts and how to build a personal brand are critical skills for our athletes in this new environment. Bonchik highlights that Indiana University has been at the forefront of integrating NIL education into its athletic programs, ensuring that student-athletes are well-informed about their rights and opportunities. “It’s about empowering our athletes to make informed decisions,” she said. “We want them to take full advantage of the resources available to them.”

Dr. Clavio attends a Press Conference with media students. He discusses the impact NIL has on college athletes and universities. Photo: Emma Pierce

  The introduction of NIL rights has brought numerous opportunities for athletes, but it also creates challenges. According to an article from ESPN, while NIL has been a bonus for many athletes, concerns remain regarding equity and access. Some schools, particularly those with fewer resources, struggle to provide the same level of support as larger programs. This imbalance can create hurdles in recruitment, as athletes tend to gravitate toward schools with established NIL networks. Dr. Clavio elaborates on this issue: “The disparity in NIL resources can lead to uneven recruitment practices. Schools that can offer robust support systems and connections to local businesses have a significant advantage in attracting top talent.” This financial imbalance not only affects the athletes but also the competitive landscape of college sports, creating a situation where some programs are more likely to attract athletes based on their NIL capabilities.

Emily Bonchik is the chair on the Student Athletic Board at Indiana University. Bonchik is heavily involved with NIL and working with other members of the board to help make decisions that help benefit athletes at IU.

  In response to these changes, some universities are investing in resources to prepare their athletes for the complexities of NIL. This includes workshops, mentorship programs, and legal assistance for understanding contracts and negotiations. The Indiana University NIL initiative, which enlists law students to help navigate NIL agreements, exemplifies the university’s commitment to supporting its student athletes in this new landscape. Bouchik says, “Our goal is to ensure that athletes are not capitalizing on NIL opportunities but also able to balance these pursuits with their academic and athletic responsibilities.” The initiative has proven beneficial for many athletes, allowing them to focus on their sports and academics while simultaneously exploring their earning potential. Cate, reflecting on his experience at Butler University, states, “Knowing that the university supports us in understanding NIL was a huge factor in my decision. It makes a difference to have resources available to navigate this new terrain.” Cate emphasizes that athletes should not only seek financial gain but also prioritize personal growth and education. 

  As the NCAA continues to refine its approach to NIL and more states develop supportive legislation, the recruitment landscape will continue to evolve. Athletes will increasingly weigh financial opportunities alongside traditional factors such as coaching and academic programs. For Cate and his peers, the message is clear: the future of college sports is not just about playing games; it’s about building brands and securing financial futures. “We’re in a new era of college athletics,” Cate says. “NIL is a game changer, and it’s exciting to see how it will shape the future for athletes like me.” The NIL era represents an opportunity to not only compete at the highest level but also take charge of their financial destiness. As this continues to evolve, the potential for growth and empowerment within college sports has never been better, making it an exciting time for athletes.

We interviewed a variety of IU faculty and students to hear their thoughts on NIL. NIL has played a major role for college athletes for the past few years and now it has become more important than ever making it a popular topic of discussion.

 

References

ESPN. (2023). How NIL has impacted college sports: Balancing opportunities and challenges. ESPN. Retrieved October 2023.

Indiana University. (2023). IU athletic NIL policy: Guidance for student-athletes.

###

Under the Radar: How College Athletes Made Money Before NIL

By Cassidy Roche, Alex Gastineau, and Peyton Cripe

BLOOMINGTON, Indiana (Nov. 5, 2024) – Before the NCAA rulings on name, image, and likeness, student-athletes devised creative ways to make money and avoid violations. 

As of 2021, college athletes can profit from their NIL and are given opportunities to earn what they would have made in the past. Historically, these athletes would have been fined if they were found profiting from their NIL. Therefore, they came up with ways to pocket some extra cash in a way that wouldn’t get them in trouble with the NCAA.

Trey Humphrey, the owner of Hoosier A1 Vintage, has been working under the radar with student-athletes by helping them avoid these violations from 2020 to 2021. However, it wasn’t easy and came with many challenges. “Obviously dealing with athletes before that time as a business was… completely different because you couldn’t have them promote your business,” Humphrey said. Colleges would flag an athlete for attempting to use their likeness if they made any sort of wage. This led to Hoosier A1 Vintage receiving cease and desist orders from IU for having athletes show up to advertise the business and appear in promotional material.

Trey Humphrey (Right), owner of Hoosier A1 Vintage, taking a picture with Dave Portnoy of Barstool Sports. Trey has worked with many athletes and public figures to help boost their brands.

Humphrey also aims to help athletes start their small businesses. By partnering with these clothing businesses owned by IU athletes, he could create pop-ups as a way to sell their clothing in collaboration with his store. This way the athletes could make their own money at the Hoosier A1 Vintage pop-ups which doesn’t require using their likeness. From the NCAA’s point of view, it isn’t clear if the athlete is getting paid out or making money in some other way.  “[It’s about] focusing on personal relationships, not putting money in their pockets,” Humphrey said when asked about how workflow has changed since the NIL ruling. He now, more than ever, values his relationships with the athletes instead of the monetary aspect.

Turner More posing for his graduation headshot on May 3rd, 2022. He is a Sophomore at Indiana University and a Social Media admin for Red Cup News Indiana.

Although NIL has come a long way, collegiate athletes have gotten into a lot more trouble for showing up in promotional material in the past. Turner More is an IU student and social media marketer for Red Cup News. He recalls when the head basketball coach at Syracuse, Jim Boeheim, had wins stripped away because a couple of his players were paid to coach an amateur basketball league. “I remember growing up a Syracuse fan. This was impactful to me because it seemed like these athletes weren’t doing much wrong and were doing something good for the community,” More said. Volunteering for the game was outside of the player’s media rights, which is why they got in trouble for it. These media rights are a long list of things athletes can and can’t do to promote themselves or earn money based on their NIL. Other athletes saw scandals like this and took precautions in how they made their money. There were a lot of under-the-table deals with families and promises for athletes for when they graduated, More said. Some universities would make promises like these to keep athletes from leaving and players would hold on to these deals in hopes of being able to earn extra money.

Expanding on these under-the-table payments from boosters and the universities themselves, comments from an expert on IU’s campus include more than a negative outlook on athletes not being able to make money pre-NIL. Jeremy Gray is the Senior Associate Athletic Director for Strategic Communications and Director of the Cuban Center. After interviewing him about some ways athletes in college made money before the NIL ruling, he explained that there was a lot of cheating going on. One way universities got around paying their players without repercussions was by having them work camps. Overall, he called the situation before the ruling “fundamentally unfair” for student-athletes. 

Jeremy Gray posing for his Indiana University headshot on March 17th, 2021. He has served as the Director of the Cuban Center since 2018 and provided insight on how student-athletes made money prior to the NIL ruling.

When asked his opinion on athletes having to get around the NCAA to make money pre-NIL, he stayed firm in his stance. “It was unfair. Any of you can make money by being an Instagram influencer, but they can’t?” Gray said. Pointing out the fact that any college student can profit off of their own NIL if they aren’t a student-athlete wavers an argument that has been echoed across the nation. Former collegiate athletes have spoken out about how because they didn’t have the opportunity to capitalize on their NIL previously, they are frustrated and want to carry out lawsuits. 

Although this is an ever-changing hot topic in the sports industry, uncovering ways that student-athletes provided for themselves opened up an opportunity to shed light on why NIL ruling is important to the athletes of today. 

 

On Sunday, October 20th strangers on Kirkwood gave their opinions on athletes having to get around NCAA violations before the 2021 NIL ruling. The interviewees explained their stances on how athletes should have gone about making money and  if it was justified. 

 

###

NCAA: NIL AND ITS BENEFITS TO COLLEGIATE ATHLETES

By Sydney Bailey, Keane Blackbourne, and Carson Hilbert

Name, Image, and Likeness brought along many benefits for student-athletes individually. In 2021, the Supreme Court made a landmark decision regarding NIL deals in the case National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston. This case entirely changed the game for college athletes as they were now allowed to make profit on their name, image, and likeness due to the opinion of the Court. The benefits that this case has on college athletes are plentiful, as they are now able to see money flowing straight into their pockets from NIL deals. Freshman Volleyball player at The Ohio State University, Olivia Hasbrook, shares her insight on how the new NIL ruling has positively impacted her as an individual. 

Olivia Hasbrook
Hasbrook leaps as she serves the ball. Volleyball has been a prominent part of her life since she was 5 years old.

Hasbrook quickly settled an NIL deal with Ozuna Fresh, an air freshening company, quickly following her arrival at Ohio State. Hasbrook states, “Ozuna Fresh has given me several free products that I use in my dorm and locker room that are really nice to have.” Aside from the products she’s received, Hasbrook addresses how her NIL deal has benefitted her financially as she explained, “Ozuna Fresh has given me a lot of opportunities for money with paid media day opportunities as well as connections with other athletes.” The NIL ruling has made several athletes’ lives easier as they no longer have to worry about financials while being an ‘unemployed’ college athlete.  

Galen Clavio
Dr. Clavio speaks on his expertise as a sports media professor. He went into great detail about the new NIL ruling

NIL has helped many athletes to financially benefit off themselves. Dr. Clavio, a professor for IU and Director of the National Sports Journalism center, spoke about what NIL is and what it’s doing for athletes. NIL especially has given light to women’s sports with athletes like Caitlin Clark, Livvy Dunne, and Angel Reese have made a huge pathway for women colligate athletes. 

“NIL has opened a door for women sports,” says Dr. Clavio, “It’s easier to view college athletes compared to five years ago.” Women’s sports due to NIL has made viewers more interested in women’s sports. Especially when rising stars in women’s college basketball such as Paige Bueckers and Flau’jae Johnson now starting to rise it could raise the standard even more for women’s sports.  

Also, with the new settlement college athletes will receive more money after a judge granted a $2.78 billion legal settlement to those athletes. With this NCAA schools are going to be limited to spend around 23 million each year with the money of the cap rising each year. The schools will be restricted to pay around 22% of media revenue, ticket revenue, and sponsorships revenue with student athletes. This settlement means that athletes could get paid even more money than what they have been before if the cap gets higher and higher. 

“There’s no legal basis for the amount the athlete can be paid,” says Dr. Clavio. With this information athletes could potentially paid millions or even and could be paid similar to what professional athletes are. This could be potentially very tricky for schools but positive for athletes as they don’t have to worry to much about their future careers if the athletes are being paid really good money. 

Several strangers around Indiana University’s campus are asked about what they feel the benefits to NIL are. Their answers had great variety but shared a few common themes

With the turn in all these laws surrounding collegiate athletes being paid, many of them are now making upwards of hundreds of thousands of dollars for their representation of the universities as high-level athletes. While we can clearly see the benefit that this had for the student-athletes, it is also fair to say that it can be just as beneficial for the universities that are touting their big name athletes. Especially when there are big name athletes in smaller sports. Take Livvy Dunne for example. She is and was a very popular internet personality, but competes in gymnastics, a sport that isn’t terribly popular outside of the Olympics. However, LSU’s arena was nearly sold out in every one of their matches for the 2024 season. According to Voltedu.com, “With an online following in the seven figures, who is to say how big of an impact she had on ticket sales.” Since the schools themselves don’t have to pay the athletes, this comes as an advantage for both parties. Other athletes will also be more interested after seeing the opportunities that are available to them, raising the advantage even more by offering the chance for more talent or big names to represent their university.

###